Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Attached is the current state of my work on generalizing operator classes
> into "operator families", as per discussion last week. It's far from
> ready to apply, but I thought I'd circulate it for comments. What's done
> is ...
> Comments?
Didn't we say discussion should happen on -hackers so development progress
would be more visible?
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com