Re: crash-safe visibility map, take three

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: crash-safe visibility map, take three
Date: 2010-12-02 11:37:57
Message-ID: 87d3pk1k2y.fsf@hi-media-techno.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Or maybe I do. One other thing I've been thinking about with regard
> to hint bit updates is that we might choose to mark that are
> hint-bit-updated as "untidy" rather than "dirty". The background

Please review archives, you'll find the idea discussed and some patches
to implement it, by Simon. I suppose you could begin here:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2008-06/msg00113.php

Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2010-12-02 12:00:21 Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-12-02 11:31:42 Re: Hot Standby: too many KnownAssignedXids