Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: crash-safe visibility map, take three

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: crash-safe visibility map, take three
Date: 2010-12-02 11:37:57
Message-ID: 87d3pk1k2y.fsf@hi-media-techno.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Or maybe I do.  One other thing I've been thinking about with regard
> to hint bit updates is that we might choose to mark that are
> hint-bit-updated as "untidy" rather than "dirty".  The background

Please review archives, you'll find the idea discussed and some patches
to implement it, by Simon. I suppose you could begin here:

  http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2008-06/msg00113.php

Regards,  
-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Dimitri FontaineDate: 2010-12-02 12:00:21
Subject: Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
Previous:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2010-12-02 11:31:42
Subject: Re: Hot Standby: too many KnownAssignedXids

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group