Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Why are you worrying with the non-PGXS build chain anyway? Just assume
> that the module is going to be built with PGXS and things should just
> We've gone over this a dozen times in the past.
I'm not sure why we still support the pre-PGXS build recipe in the
contrib Makefiles, and didn't want to change that as part as the
extension patch series, but I think we should reconsider.
This and removing module_pathname in the control files to just use
$libdir/contrib in the .sql files. That would set a better example to
people who want to make their own extensions, as the general case is
that those will not get into contrib.
I think we should lower the differences between contrib and external
extensions, so that contrib is only about who maintains the code and
distribute the extension.
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Nicolas Barbier||Date: 2011-03-30 11:21:28|
|Subject: Re: PostgreSQL sourcecode|
|Previous:||From: Fujii Masao||Date: 2011-03-30 08:12:27|
|Subject: Re: Problem with streaming replication, backups, and