"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:

> One thought I had was to force Windows to use CVS export rather than update.
> This has 2 disadvantages: it requires a complete repo fetch every run, even
> if we don't need to do anything because nothing has changed, and it also
> means we can't report the version numbers on files changed. 

You could also just have the windows machine rsync the directory from one of
the other build machines?


-- 
greg

In response to

• Re: 'CVS-Unknown' buildfarm failures? at 2006-06-04 13:18:59 from Andrew Dunstan

Responses

• Re: 'CVS-Unknown' buildfarm failures? at 2006-06-04 21:52:45 from Andrew Dunstan

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Andrew Dunstan	Date: 2006-06-04 21:52:45
	Subject: Re: 'CVS-Unknown' buildfarm failures?
Previous:	From: Greg Stark	Date: 2006-06-04 21:39:17
	Subject: Re: Possible TODO item: copy to/from pipe