"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> One thought I had was to force Windows to use CVS export rather than update.
> This has 2 disadvantages: it requires a complete repo fetch every run, even
> if we don't need to do anything because nothing has changed, and it also
> means we can't report the version numbers on files changed.
You could also just have the windows machine rsync the directory from one of
the other build machines?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2006-06-04 21:52:45|
|Subject: Re: 'CVS-Unknown' buildfarm failures?|
|Previous:||From: Greg Stark||Date: 2006-06-04 21:39:17|
|Subject: Re: Possible TODO item: copy to/from pipe|