Re: TOAST usage setting

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TOAST usage setting
Date: 2007-06-06 15:24:53
Message-ID: 87bqftf6m2.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:

> Well, it is summarized here:
>
> http://momjian.us/expire/TOAST/SUMMARY.html
>
> It made non-TOAST access 2x faster, but TOAST 7x slower, and that seemed
> like a good compromise.

Is this still testing with all data fitting in RAM?

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD 2007-06-06 15:29:45 Re: TOAST usage setting
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-06-06 15:23:00 Re: Implicit casts with generic arrays