Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: What is the best way to storage music files in Postgresql

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: <david(at)lang(dot)hm>
Cc: "Andrej Ricnik-Bay" <andrej(dot)groups(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Craig Ringer" <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: What is the best way to storage music files in Postgresql
Date: 2008-03-18 19:46:53
Message-ID: 87bq5blsr6.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
<david(at)lang(dot)hm> writes:

> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Andrej Ricnik-Bay wrote:
>
>>
>> On 18/03/2008, Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:
>>> Isn't a 10 or 24 spindle RAID 5 array awfully likely to encounter a
>>>  double disk failure (such as during the load imposed by rebuild onto a
>>>  spare) ?
>
> that's why you should use raid6 (allowing for dual failures)

You can have as many parity drives as you want with RAID 5 too.

-- 
  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com
  Ask me about EnterpriseDB's RemoteDBA services!

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: davidDate: 2008-03-18 20:01:28
Subject: Re: What is the best way to storage music files in Postgresql
Previous:From: Scott MarloweDate: 2008-03-18 19:46:51
Subject: Re: Planner mis-estimation using nested loops followup

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group