> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Andrej Ricnik-Bay wrote:
>> On 18/03/2008, Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:
>>> Isn't a 10 or 24 spindle RAID 5 array awfully likely to encounter a
>>> double disk failure (such as during the load imposed by rebuild onto a
>>> spare) ?
> that's why you should use raid6 (allowing for dual failures)
You can have as many parity drives as you want with RAID 5 too.
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's RemoteDBA services!
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: david||Date: 2008-03-18 20:01:28|
|Subject: Re: What is the best way to storage music files in Postgresql|
|Previous:||From: Scott Marlowe||Date: 2008-03-18 19:46:51|
|Subject: Re: Planner mis-estimation using nested loops followup|