| From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "PostgreSQL Development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Recursive query syntax ambiguity |
| Date: | 2007-01-26 20:22:17 |
| Message-ID: | 87ac05a686.fsf@stark.xeocode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Can you post the rules you have so far that you're playing around with? (Also
> maybe the rules from the standard - I don't have a copy handy).
This is the best compromise I've come up with so far. It makes CYCLE a
reserved word and requires a CYCLE clause if there's a SEARCH clause.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| query-expression.pdf | application/pdf | 3.1 KB |
| search-or-cycle-clause.pdf | application/pdf | 4.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gevik Babakhani | 2007-01-26 20:34:10 | VC2005 build and pthreads |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2007-01-26 19:58:53 | NULL value in subselect in UNION causes error |