craig_james(at)emolecules(dot)com (Craig James) writes:
> Dave Cramer wrote:
>> So I tried writing directly to the device, gets around 250MB/s,
>> reads at around 500MB/s
>>
>> The client is using redhat so xfs is not an option.
>
> I'm using Red Hat and XFS, and have been for years. Why is XFS not an option with Red Hat?
If you report practically any kind of problem, and you're using XFS,
or JFS, or such, their "support offering" is to tell you to use a
supported filesystem.
--
let name="cbbrowne" and tld="cbbrowne.com" in name ^ "@" ^ tld;;
http://linuxdatabases.info/info/linuxxian.html
"The only thing better than TV with the sound off is Radio with the
sound off." -- Dave Moon