Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

io storm on checkpoints, postgresql 8.2.4, linux

From: "Dmitry Potapov" <fortune(dot)fish(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: io storm on checkpoints, postgresql 8.2.4, linux
Date: 2007-08-22 15:33:35
Message-ID: 878c83960708220833l72dbd461k827aea77ec7d6c32@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
            Hello!

    We run a large (~66Gb) web-backend database on Postgresql 8.2.4 on
Linux. The hardware is  Dual Xeon 5130 with 16Gb ram, LSI Megaraid U320-2x
scsi controller w/512Mb writeback cache and a BBU. Storage setup contains 3
raid10 arrays (data, xlog, indexes, each on different array), 12 HDDs total.
Frontend application uses jdbc driver, connection pooling and threads.

    We've run into an issue of IO storms on checkpoints. Once in 20min
(which is checkpoint_interval) the database becomes unresponsive for about
4-8 seconds. Query processing is suspended, server does nothing but writing
a large amount of data to disks. Because of the db server being stalled,
some of the web clients get timeout and disconnect, which is unacceptable.
Even worse, as the new requests come at a pretty constant rate, by the time
this storm comes to an end there is a huge amount of sleeping app. threads
waiting for their queries to complete. After the db server comes back to
life again, these threads wake up and flood it with queries, so performance
suffer even more, for some minutes after the checkpoint.

    It seemed strange to me that our 70%-read db generates so much dirty
pages that writing them out takes 4-8 seconds and grabs the full bandwidth.
First, I started to tune bgwriter to a more aggressive settings, but this
was of no help, nearly no performance changes at all. Digging into the issue
further, I discovered that linux page cache was the reason. "Dirty"
parameter in /proc/meminfo (which shows the amount of ready-to-write "dirty"
data currently sitting in page cache) grows between checkpoints from 0 to
about 100Mb. When checkpoint comes, all the 100mb got flushed out to disk,
effectively causing a IO storm.

    I found this (http://www.westnet.com/~gsmith/content/linux-pdflush.htm
<http://www.westnet.com/%7Egsmith/content/linux-pdflush.htm>) document and
peeked into mm/page-writeback.c in linux kernel source tree. I'm not sure
that I understand pdflush writeout semantics correctly, but looks like when
the amount of "dirty" data is less than dirty_background_ratio*RAM/100,
pdflush only writes pages in background, waking up every
dirty_writeback_centisecs and writing no more than 1024 pages
(MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES constant). When we hit dirty_background_ratio, pdflush
starts to write out more agressively.

    So, looks like the following scenario takes place: postgresql constantly
writes something to database and xlog files, dirty data gets to the page
cache, and then slowly written out by pdflush. When postgres generates more
dirty pages than pdflush writes out, the amount of dirty data in the
pagecache is growing. When we're at checkpoint, postgres does fsync() on the
database files, and sleeps until the whole page cache is written out.

    By default, dirty_background_ratio is 2%, which is about 328Mb of 16Gb
total. Following the curring pdflush logic, nearly this amount of data we
face to write out on checkpoint effective stalling everything else, so even
1% of 16Gb is too much. My setup experience 4-8 sec pause in operation even
on ~100Mb dirty pagecache...

     I temporaly solved this problem by setting dirty_background_ratio to
0%. This causes the dirty data to be written out immediately. It is ok for
our setup (mostly because of large controller cache), but it doesn't looks
to me as an elegant solution. Is there some other way to fix this issue
without disabling pagecache and the IO smoothing it was designed to perform?

-- 
Regards,
            Dmitry

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Kenneth MarshallDate: 2007-08-22 15:57:19
Subject: Re: io storm on checkpoints, postgresql 8.2.4, linux
Previous:From: Michael GlaesemannDate: 2007-08-22 13:25:26
Subject: Re: Optimising "in" queries

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group