"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> This falls in the category of "destabilizing the code for purely
> cosmetic reasons", and would be a foolish change to make at RC1 time.
I suppose. Expect to have more bug reports like this one then though.
> We could change the text of the ERROR message reasonably easily,
> but changing the basic transaction abort method is right out.
I fear having a message saying "ERROR This is not an error" is going to get us
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's RemoteDBA services!
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2007-12-04 17:05:42|
|Subject: Re: BUG #3790: pg_restore error canceling statement duetouser request|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-12-04 15:32:09|
|Subject: Re: BUG #3790: pg_restore error canceling statement due touser request |