Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Concurrent psql patch

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Jim Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, "pgsql-patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Concurrent psql patch
Date: 2007-06-01 15:16:12
Message-ID: 876467yabn.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:

> Unless you have a better solution I think we'd better do that, though.
>
> I notice that the header is also included in command.c even though it doesn't
> use PGASYNC_IDLE.
>
> Are you going to make these fixes?

Yes, sorry, I started to already but got distracted by some tests I've been running.


-- 
  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2007-06-01 15:57:36
Subject: Re: Autovacuum versus rolled-back transactions
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2007-06-01 14:38:48
Subject: Re: Updated bitmap index patch

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2007-06-01 17:11:23
Subject: Re: COPY-able csv log outputs
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2007-06-01 14:38:48
Subject: Re: Updated bitmap index patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group