Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 8.4 release planning

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.4 release planning
Date: 2009-01-26 15:35:02
Message-ID: 874ozmjd21.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:

> I fail to see how rejecting unreviewed patches provides benefit for
> users, developers or sponsors. 

Nobody has suggested rejecting either sync replication or standby database.
The debate here is over whether to commit into 8.4 or into 8.5.

Put another way, the choice here is whether to have a half-baked delayed 8.4
release in 6 months or a polished on-time 8.5 release in 12 months. Either way
the feature ships and on a not terribly different timeline either.

-- 
  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com
  Ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostGIS support!

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Albe LaurenzDate: 2009-01-26 15:40:12
Subject: Re: problem with archive_command as suggested by documentation
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2009-01-26 15:30:48
Subject: Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql:Automatic view update rules)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group