Re: Cleaning up the INET/CIDR mess

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: andrew(at)supernews(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Cleaning up the INET/CIDR mess
Date: 2006-01-26 15:34:22
Message-ID: 873bjbt341.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew - Supernews <andrew+nonews(at)supernews(dot)com> writes:

> The spec is quite explicit that inet_pton is not expected to accept the
> abbreviated forms or any non-decimal values.

Hum. That distinctly doesn't match my memory but it seems you're right. The
spec mandates inet_ntoa and inet_addr support it but not inet_ntop. Odd.

--
greg

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bricklen Anderson 2006-01-26 17:07:16 Re: Rollback Mountain
Previous Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2006-01-26 14:41:08 Re: autovacuum