Re: BUG #2830: Wrong results for prepared statements while clustering target table

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "" <martin(dot)pihlak(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #2830: Wrong results for prepared statements while clustering target table
Date: 2006-12-16 23:15:17
Message-ID: 8738.1166310917@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

"" <martin(dot)pihlak(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Prepared SELECT/UPDATE/DELETE statements produce wrong results if executed
> while target table is being clustered.

The short answer is "don't CLUSTER while the table is in live use" ...

CLUSTER re-inserts all the rows in the table into a fresh table. This
means that all the rows appear to have been inserted by the CLUSTER
transaction, and therefore that a transaction that scans the table
afterward with a snapshot taken before the CLUSTER committed will not
see those rows.

It'd be better if CLUSTER preserved the rows' MVCC state but don't hold
your breath for that; any such change is certainly not going to get
back-patched into stable releases.

The difference between EXECUTE and SELECT behavior here is just a chance
matter of exactly where the snap is taken during the parse/execute code
path --- your SELECT works because it blocks for AccessShareLock on the
table before it sets the snap. But SELECT would fail just the same way
within a serializable transaction that had already set its snapshot.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-12-17 00:01:22 Re: BUG #2829: Runaway logs - "SSL SYSCALL error"
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-12-16 22:39:13 Re: lost on referentail integrity