Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Date: 2003-11-18 05:21:04
Message-ID: 871xs68d6n.fsf@stark.dyndns.tv
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers


Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com> writes:

> 1) PITR
> 2) Distributed Tx
> 3) Replication
> 4) Nested Tx
> 5) PL/SQL Exception Handling

Of these PITR seems *by far* the most important. It makes the difference
between an enterprise-class database capable of running 24x7 with disaster
recovery plans, and a lesser beast that needs to be shut down for cold backups
periodically.

Features like Nested Transactions and Exception Handling are "would be nice"
features. Especially for pre-existing code-bases. But for new projects they're
not things that make the difference between measuring up and not.

Besides, Oracle 8 had Replication the way Mysql has transactions... It a
recently bolted-on addition that only worked in limited cases until a few
rewrites later.

Oh, and yeah, a win32 port. Yay, another OS port. Postgres runs on dozens of
OSes already. What's so exciting about one more? Even if it is a
pathologically hard OS to port to. Just because it was hard doesn't mean it's
useful.

--
greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-11-18 05:36:42 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Previous Message Gavin Sherry 2003-11-18 04:18:48 Press coverage in Australia

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-11-18 05:36:42 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-11-18 04:41:48 So as not to break it for anyone ...