Re: damage control mode

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: damage control mode
Date: 2010-01-12 09:19:59
Message-ID: 871vhvbry8.fsf@hi-media-techno.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I agree. My main concern in terms of dealing with these outstanding
> is that it will distract us, particularly Tom, from stabilizing the
> tree, especially HS, VF, and SR. If the tree were in a releasable
> state today I wouldn't be worrying about it.

You sound like you want to drop the last Commit Fest and prepare beta
instead.

Regards,
--
dim

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-01-12 09:28:41 Re: Typed tables
Previous Message Takahiro Itagaki 2010-01-12 09:06:22 Pretty printed trigger in psql