Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: damage control mode

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: damage control mode
Date: 2010-01-12 09:19:59
Message-ID: 871vhvbry8.fsf@hi-media-techno.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I agree.  My main concern in terms of dealing with these outstanding
> is that it will distract us, particularly Tom, from stabilizing the
> tree, especially HS, VF, and SR.  If the tree were in a releasable
> state today I wouldn't be worrying about it.

You sound like you want to drop the last Commit Fest and prepare beta
instead.

Regards,
-- 
dim

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2010-01-12 09:28:41
Subject: Re: Typed tables
Previous:From: Takahiro ItagakiDate: 2010-01-12 09:06:22
Subject: Pretty printed trigger in psql

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group