From: | merlyn(at)stonehenge(dot)com (Randal L(dot) Schwartz) |
---|---|
To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
Cc: | Selena Deckelmann <selena(at)chrisking(dot)com>, pdxpug(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PERFORMANCE meeting summary & next meeting topic! |
Date: | 2006-09-20 17:33:31 |
Message-ID: | 86lkoewihg.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pdxpug |
>>>>> "David" == David E Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
David> On Sep 20, 2006, at 09:03, Selena Deckelmann wrote:
>> The general consensus was that she should upgrade. We didn't have a clear
>> answer to why the query was so slow in the older version, but it was clear
>> that it was faster in the newer version of postgresql.
David> Actually, I think that the consensus was that she should try increasing the
David> sort_mem on the 7.4 database to see if that helps. But upgrading is a
David> no-brainer, too. :-)
Does that mean there's no consensus on what the consensus was? Eeek!
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn(at)stonehenge(dot)com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Selena Deckelmann | 2006-09-20 17:53:25 | Re: PERFORMANCE meeting summary & next meeting topic! |
Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2006-09-20 17:29:31 | Re: PERFORMANCE meeting summary & next meeting topic! |