Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PERFORMANCE meeting summary & next meeting topic!

From: merlyn(at)stonehenge(dot)com (Randal L(dot) Schwartz)
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: Selena Deckelmann <selena(at)chrisking(dot)com>, pdxpug(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PERFORMANCE meeting summary & next meeting topic!
Date: 2006-09-20 17:33:31
Message-ID: 86lkoewihg.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pdxpug
>>>>> "David" == David E Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:

David> On Sep 20, 2006, at 09:03, Selena Deckelmann wrote:
>> The general consensus was that she should upgrade.  We didn't have  a clear
>> answer to why the query was so slow in the older version,  but it was clear
>> that it was faster in the newer version of  postgresql.

David> Actually, I think that the consensus was that she should try  increasing the
David> sort_mem on the 7.4 database to see if that helps. But  upgrading is a
David> no-brainer, too. :-)

Does that mean there's no consensus on what the consensus was?  Eeek!

-- 
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn(at)stonehenge(dot)com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!

In response to

Responses

pdxpug by date

Next:From: Selena DeckelmannDate: 2006-09-20 17:53:25
Subject: Re: PERFORMANCE meeting summary & next meeting topic!
Previous:From: David E. WheelerDate: 2006-09-20 17:29:31
Subject: Re: PERFORMANCE meeting summary & next meeting topic!

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group