Re: Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL CVS Patch Question

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jason Tishler <Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL CVS Patch Question
Date: 2001-01-10 04:39:07
Message-ID: 8630.979101547@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-ports

Jason Tishler <Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com> writes:
>> I don't think gcc will try to optimize away an assignment to a global
>> variable.

> You are correct -- the above program fails as expected.

Oh, good.

> Are you going to change config/c-library.m4 to generate the above
> program instead?

This is Peter's turf, but I will take care of it if he doesn't get to it
soon. In the meantime, please work up a final Cygwin patch on the
assumption that configure will be fixed as above.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jason Tishler 2001-01-10 17:47:20 Re: Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL CVS Patch Question
Previous Message Jason Tishler 2001-01-10 01:54:41 Re: Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL CVS Patch Question