Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: clang's static checker report.

From: Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj(at)pointblue(dot)com(dot)pl>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: clang's static checker report.
Date: 2009-08-30 14:57:22
Message-ID: 85B187C6-93F2-4051-BEB4-884630926DCF@pointblue.com.pl (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 30 Aug 2009, at 15:46, Greg Stark wrote:

> So three of the four dead initialization warnings are legitimate -- if
> minor -- errors. Attached is a patch to remove the redundant
> initializations.


well, all I can do is this: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=4832

I find it hard to belive tho, that it only found 4 possible positives ;)


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Greg StarkDate: 2009-08-30 15:10:49
Subject: Re: clang's static checker report.
Previous:From: Greg StarkDate: 2009-08-30 14:46:24
Subject: Re: clang's static checker report.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group