Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

RE: Re: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] 6.2 protocol

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "'pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Re: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] 6.2 protocol
Date: 2001-02-14 08:28:06
Message-ID: 8568FC767B4AD311AC33006097BCD3D61A2999@woody.vale-housing.co.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: 14 February 2001 06:29
> To: Cedar Cox
> Cc: 'pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org'
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] Re: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] 6.2 protocol
> 
> 
> > > > I am not sure how much that confuses things.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Surely just a copy of the full installshield installation 
> on the ftp server
> > > would suffice (and wouldn't exactly eat disk space!).
> > 
> > Where would one get the source for this "unsupported" 
> driver?  (..not that
> > I care).  Being open source software, I'd hate to see 
> something binary
> > only..
> > 
> 
> Compatibility is back in the ODBC driver source code.
> 

Not that I'm questioning your wisdom Bruce :-) but I got the impression that
most people who commented on this issue thought that removal of the code was
the better option to keep things tidy. Did I miss something?

Regards, Dave.

Responses

pgsql-odbc by date

Next:From: Hiroshi InoueDate: 2001-02-14 08:45:45
Subject: Re: [ODBC] ODBC <6.4 protocol
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2001-02-14 08:13:21
Subject: RE: [ODBC] ODBC <6.4 protocol

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group