Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

RE: Updated ODBC Driver Download

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "'Cedar Cox'" <cedarc(at)visionforisrael(dot)com>, "'pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Updated ODBC Driver Download
Date: 2001-01-28 21:21:22
Message-ID: 8568FC767B4AD311AC33006097BCD3D61A2932@woody.vale-housing.co.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cedar Cox [mailto:cedarc(at)visionforisrael(dot)com]
> Sent: 26 January 2001 14:54
> To: Dave Page
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] Updated ODBC Driver Download
> 
> 
> 
> Thank you for all your work.. I'll try to get around to testing some
> things now.  Also, I was just wondering about the version number
> scheme.  Does this mean that for a given PG version number
> (eg. 7.01) there could be up to 9999 patches?
> 
> -Cedar

No problem - expect bugs though, this is the first C code I've contributed
to anything and I'm far from an expert!

The version number follows what I think was Byron's scheme when he was
updating it reguarly - 06.40.0209 would be rev 9 for PostgreSQL 6.4.2. The
xx.xx.xxxx format is required by the ODBC spec, I just made it 07.01.0001
(note the minor version number change) as it seemed to make more sense. I do
think that 0-9999 revisions would be a better approach than 0209 though.

Regard, Dave.

pgsql-odbc by date

Next:From: Constantin S. SvintsoffDate: 2001-01-30 14:25:22
Subject: Getting bytea results via SQLGetData
Previous:From: JosephDate: 2001-01-26 21:08:24
Subject: Rules and MS Access

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group