Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

RE: RE: JDBC now needs updates for large objects

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "'pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: RE: JDBC now needs updates for large objects
Date: 2000-10-25 08:28:33
Message-ID: 8568FC767B4AD311AC33006097BCD3D61A26D4@woody.vale-housing.co.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Mount [mailto:petermount(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk]
> Sent: 24 October 2000 12:43
> To: 'Tom Lane'; Peter Mount
> Cc: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org; pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
> Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] RE: JDBC now needs updates for 
> large objects 
> 
> 
> Yes, the joins were one of the reasons I was going to do it.
> 
> If no one starts a list by Saturday, then I'll start one when 
> I go through
> JDBC.
> 
> Peter

I have done some work like this for the next release of pgAdmin (mainly
views to allow easy reporting on db objects) - if you want copies of what I
have let me know, it might be a starting point.

Dave.

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: stuart hodgkinsonDate: 2000-10-25 08:54:35
Subject: ODBC info & help!
Previous:From: Ken KachnowichDate: 2000-10-24 23:09:45
Subject: Re: RE: datetime fix

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group