| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: explain output infelicity in psql |
| Date: | 2009-12-11 03:25:44 |
| Message-ID: | 8564.1260501944@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Hilariously enough, that's exactly what we used to do. I am leaning
> toward the view that we should revert all the ASCII output format
> changes vs. 8.4 and let people use the new unicode mode if they want
> all the spiffy bells and whistles.
There are clearly use-cases for this feature; I think arguing to revert
it is an extreme overreaction. We could reconsider which behavior ought
to be default, perhaps.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2009-12-11 03:39:20 | Re: SE-PostgreSQL/Lite Review |
| Previous Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2009-12-11 03:02:41 | Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460) |