Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> That would suck for me. I use git log a lot to see how things have
>> changed over time.
> Indeed. Losing the history is not an acceptable option.
I think the same. If git is not able to maintain our project history
then it is not mature enough to be considered as our official VCS.
This is not a negotiable requirement.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2009-05-28 14:53:10|
|Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up|
|Previous:||From: Kevin Grittner||Date: 2009-05-28 14:47:47|
|Subject: Re: User-facing aspects of serializable transactions|