Re: [QUESTIONS] Re: [HACKERS] C++ interface

From: maycock(at)intelliquest(dot)com
To: maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us
Cc: hackers-pgsql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [QUESTIONS] Re: [HACKERS] C++ interface
Date: 1998-03-23 21:00:03
Message-ID: 852565D0.0070ED45.00@notesatl.pcpipeline.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce,

I will try and start taking a look at the libpq++ over the weekend to
familarize myself with
the way that it is structured. Then, if someone will promise to help guide
me through the
changes required, I will see if I can work on them.

Thanks,

Matt

maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us on 03/23/98 01:39:55 PM

To: todd(at)nm(dot)net
cc: pgsql-questions(at)postgreSQL(dot)org (bcc: Matt Aycock/IntelliQuest)
Subject: Re: [QUESTIONS] Re: [HACKERS] C++ interface

>
> howdy,
>
> we're using the libpq++ c++ interface for a medium-sized network,
> multi-user scheduling application that uses a java front end, a c++
> middleware server and the postgres backend. the c++ interface (a matter
> of preference, obvious) is much cleaner than the c interface (especially
> for True Believers in OO), but it does seem to be suffering from lack of
> update. it works fine for basic stuff with 6.3, though.

I agree it needs updating, but I didn't have the time to do it.

--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
--
Official WWW Site: http://www.postgresql.org
Online Docs & FAQ: http://www.postgresql.org/docs
Searchable Lists: http://www.postgresql.org/mhonarc

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-03-23 21:17:08 Re: [HACKERS] URGENT PROBLEM with the 6.3->6.3.1 patch
Previous Message Darren King 1998-03-23 20:39:11 Re: [HACKERS] char types gone.