From: | maycock(at)intelliquest(dot)com |
---|---|
To: | maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us |
Cc: | hackers-pgsql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [QUESTIONS] Re: [HACKERS] C++ interface |
Date: | 1998-03-23 21:00:03 |
Message-ID: | 852565D0.0070ED45.00@notesatl.pcpipeline.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce,
I will try and start taking a look at the libpq++ over the weekend to
familarize myself with
the way that it is structured. Then, if someone will promise to help guide
me through the
changes required, I will see if I can work on them.
Thanks,
Matt
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us on 03/23/98 01:39:55 PM
To: todd(at)nm(dot)net
cc: pgsql-questions(at)postgreSQL(dot)org (bcc: Matt Aycock/IntelliQuest)
Subject: Re: [QUESTIONS] Re: [HACKERS] C++ interface
>
> howdy,
>
> we're using the libpq++ c++ interface for a medium-sized network,
> multi-user scheduling application that uses a java front end, a c++
> middleware server and the postgres backend. the c++ interface (a matter
> of preference, obvious) is much cleaner than the c interface (especially
> for True Believers in OO), but it does seem to be suffering from lack of
> update. it works fine for basic stuff with 6.3, though.
I agree it needs updating, but I didn't have the time to do it.
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
--
Official WWW Site: http://www.postgresql.org
Online Docs & FAQ: http://www.postgresql.org/docs
Searchable Lists: http://www.postgresql.org/mhonarc
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1998-03-23 21:17:08 | Re: [HACKERS] URGENT PROBLEM with the 6.3->6.3.1 patch |
Previous Message | Darren King | 1998-03-23 20:39:11 | Re: [HACKERS] char types gone. |