Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: trouble with to_char('L')

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Hiroshi Inoue <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Mikko <mhannesy(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: trouble with to_char('L')
Date: 2010-02-25 23:32:05
Message-ID: 8452.1267140725@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Where are we on this issue?

According to my files, I complained about the extreme ugliness of the
patch (redefining strdup for pete's sake) and the fact that it did not
actually do things anything like the LC_TIME code as was claimed.
Hiroshi rejected those criticisms.  I don't know where we are, but
I don't want to see this patch applied in this form.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2010-02-25 23:33:29
Subject: Re: trouble with to_char('L')
Previous:From: Karl SchnaitterDate: 2010-02-25 23:30:36
Subject: Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2010-02-25 23:33:29
Subject: Re: trouble with to_char('L')
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2010-02-25 23:21:58
Subject: Re: trouble with to_char('L')

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group