Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Bug#342369: PostgreSQL 8.1.0 RHEL / Debian incompatible

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Martin Pitt <martin(at)piware(dot)de>
Cc: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, Anand Kumria <wildfire(at)progsoc(dot)uts(dot)edu(dot)au>, Richard van den Berg <richard(dot)vandenberg(at)trust-factory(dot)com>, 342369(at)bugs(dot)debian(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bug#342369: PostgreSQL 8.1.0 RHEL / Debian incompatible
Date: 2005-12-13 18:03:50
Message-ID: 8429.1134497030@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-ports
Martin Pitt <martin(at)piware(dot)de> writes:
> I fully agree. (BTW, I doubt that double operations on m68k would be
> any faster than integer ones...)

Debatable at best --- most later 68k machines had hardware FPUs, but
none of them had any 64-bit-int instructions...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Shyam SunderDate: 2005-12-16 22:43:19
Subject: Postgresql 7.3.4 on Mac OS X (processor i386)
Previous:From: Stephan SzaboDate: 2005-12-13 17:49:08
Subject: Re: Bug#342369: PostgreSQL 8.1.0 RHEL / Debian incompatible

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: AndrusDate: 2005-12-13 18:49:46
Subject: Re: Toolkit for creating editable grid
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-12-13 17:58:22
Subject: Re: Memory Leakage Problem

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group