Re: Spam filtering on the mailing lists

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- --On Thursday, July 17, 2008 15:54:41 +0000 Greg Sabino Mullane
<greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> wrote:

> I grabbed a few random messages from the bugs list last night. Most
> interesting was that some had no X-Spam-Status headers at all - does this
> mean they slipped through the spam filtering entirely? Here's one of them:
>
> ===
> Return-Path: <owner-pgsql-bugs-postgresql(dot)org(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Delivered-To: pgsql-bugs-postgresql(dot)org(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183])
> by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3148650275
> for <pgsql-bugs-postgresql(dot)org(at)postgresql(dot)org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2008
> 15:40:45 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
> by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
> with ESMTP id 48600-04-3 for <pgsql-bugs-postgresql(dot)org(at)postgresql(dot)org>;
> Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:40:43 -0300 (ADT)
> X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
> Received: from wwwmaster.postgresql.org (wwwmaster.postgresql.org
> [217.196.146.204]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id
> AB1D565026D
> for <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:40:44 -0300 (ADT)
> Received: from wwwmaster.postgresql.org (wwwmaster.postgresql.org
> [217.196.146.204]) by wwwmaster.postgresql.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with
> ESMTP id m6GIehuA007983 for <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>; Wed, 16 Jul
> 2008 18:40:43 GMT (envelope-from www(at)wwwmaster(dot)postgresql(dot)org)
> Received: (from www(at)localhost)
> by wwwmaster.postgresql.org (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m6GIehIP007982;
> Wed, 16 Jul 2008 18:40:43 GMT
> (envelope-from www)
> Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 18:40:43 GMT
> Message-Id: <200807161840(dot)m6GIehIP007982(at)wwwmaster(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
> To: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: BUG #4310: PkMERMInZQ
> From: "make money on line" <makemoney(at)money2009(dot)com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1

The X-Virus-Scanned indicates it went through Amavis/Maia, not sure why it
would have bypassed the spam checker though ... let me check into it to make
sure, as I thought both "outbound" and "inbound" was scanned, but maybe just
for virus, with the expectation that if you are using a spam scanner on
incoming, you aren't sending *out* spam ...

- --
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkh/sBYACgkQ4QvfyHIvDvMDowCfXL1i6nLlR8u8zsWmJVr4z8Ue
r1EAniwfru0hTeNWPliF+nBvANpxOFaf
=3zw9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----