Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: crash-safe visibility map, take three

From: Florian Weimer <fweimer(at)bfk(dot)de>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: crash-safe visibility map, take three
Date: 2010-12-03 14:25:20
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
* Robert Haas:

> Those hint bit tests are a single machine instruction.  It's tough
> to beat that.  It's tough to get within two orders of magnitude.
> I'd like to, but I don't see how.

For some scans, it might be possible to hoist the checks out of inner
loops.  (At least in principle, I'm not sure how much that would
interfere with the executor architecture.)

Florian Weimer                <fweimer(at)bfk(dot)de>
BFK edv-consulting GmbH
Kriegsstra├če 100              tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76133 Karlsruhe             fax: +49-721-96201-99

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-12-03 14:30:21
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] column-level update privs + lock table
Previous:From: Dimitri FontaineDate: 2010-12-03 14:10:37
Subject: Re: Extensions, this time with a patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group