* Guoping Zhang:
> a) Anyone has the similar experience? How do you deal with it?
> b) Why TCP stack imposes such big delay? any tuning point I shall do?
If you use INSERT, you'll incur a network round-trip delay for each
record. Try using COPY FROM instead, possibly to a temporary table if
you need more complex calculations. If you do this, there won't be a
huge difference between local and remote access as long as the
bandwidth is sufficient.
Florian Weimer <fweimer(at)bfk(dot)de>
BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/
Durlacher Allee 47 tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76131 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Guoping Zhang||Date: 2006-07-19 07:33:34|
|Subject: Re: Performance penalty for remote access of postgresql (8.1.3)? any experiance?|
|Previous:||From: Guoping Zhang||Date: 2006-07-19 05:40:02|
|Subject: Performance penalty for remote access of postgresql (8.1.3)? any experiance?|