On May 7, 2007, at 11:03 AM, Jim Nasby wrote:
> On May 6, 2007, at 11:44 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Jim Nasby wrote:
>>> On Apr 12, 2007, at 7:54 AM, Jim Nasby wrote:
>>>> Two questions: Why is pg_backend_pid documented with the stats
>>>> functions (9.19 System Information Functions) seems more logical.
>>>> Also, I can see mentioning the stats functions in the monitoring
>>>> section, but shouldn't they actually be documented in with the rest
>>>> of the functions?
>>> No comments? Does that mean if I write up a patch it'll be accepted?
>> Yea, I was wondering about that. I think the best idea would be to
>> reference the backend functions from the main functions page, rather
>> than move them.
> Well, pg_backend_pid makes no sense being in with the stats
> functions, so I'll move it. I'll just include references to the
> other stuff.
Turns out it didn't really make much more sense to move
pg_backend_pid either, so I went with Bruce's original idea.
Description: application/octet-stream (847 bytes)
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: David Fetter||Date: 2007-05-13 21:15:26|
|Subject: OS/X startup scripts|
|Previous:||From: Jeff Davis||Date: 2007-05-09 17:19:05|
|Subject: Re: PITR and tar|