Re: Is PostGreSql's Data storage mechanism "inferior"?

Thanks everyone. After all the good things I heard about
Postgres, I was surprised to see this article; and the point on
storage concerned me.
I am glad to see that the article was wrong, not only on the storage engine
count, but also on others.
Thanks for the feedback.

On 1/30/08, Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 30, 2008, at 6:22 PM, Richard Broersma Jr wrote:
>
> > If you don't get too much feed back on this subject, just remember
> > that topics like this come up frequently to the point of list
> > member exhaustion. You can find such discussions if you search
> > the list archive.
>
> Too true. There's only so many times people can be confronted with
> "Defend yourselves!" before they start ignoring it. On the flip
> side, when you approach with "Tell me, what advantages does Postgres
> have to offer?" you'll find many people all too willing to step up
> with pride.
>
> Erik Jones
>
> DBA | Emma(R)
> erik(at)myemma(dot)com
> 800.595.4401 or 615.292.5888
> 615.292.0777 (fax)
>
> Emma helps organizations everywhere communicate & market in style.
> Visit us online at http://www.myemma.com
>
>
>
>