| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: stderr & win32 admin check |
| Date: | 2004-06-15 13:58:08 |
| Message-ID: | 824.1087307888@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
>> "Can't run Postgres securely" would be a more-than-sufficient
>> reason not to support NT4, IMHO.
> It could still be run on NT4 under the following conditions:
> 1) Running as a service
> 2) Running if the user logged in is not an administrator.
Well, isn't "running as a service" sufficient? I thought that was the
only interesting case for non-hackers anyway.
As long as you get an error message that's reasonably clear about what
you can do instead, this hardly seems like a showstopper...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2004-06-15 14:10:36 | Re: stderr & win32 admin check |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2004-06-15 13:40:17 | Re: stderr & win32 admin check |