Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: psql or pgbouncer bug?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jakub Ouhrabka <kuba(at)comgate(dot)cz>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: psql or pgbouncer bug?
Date: 2010-05-24 13:50:55
Message-ID: 8237.1274709055@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Jakub Ouhrabka <kuba(at)comgate(dot)cz> writes:
> So if I understand it correctly, if I need correct transaction behaviour 
> in psql even in case of disconnection the only safe way is to use one 
> statement per line.

In existing releases, yes.  Having put the BEGIN and UPDATE all on one
line was a necessary precondition for this problem.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Tom MolesworthDate: 2010-05-24 15:22:31
Subject: Re: psql or pgbouncer bug?
Previous:From: Greg Sabino MullaneDate: 2010-05-24 13:26:28
Subject: Re: psql or pgbouncer bug?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group