Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again
Date: 2009-04-22 18:30:36
Message-ID: 8192.1240425036@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> I think we should change the way we test it. Could we simply make 
> max_prepared_transactions = 0 the default, but put 
> "max_prepared_transactions = 5" into the config file in "make check"? 

That only works for make check, not make installcheck.  We'd really have
to complicate the GUC setup somehow to have this work, eg add a separate
enable_prepared_transactions bool that can be changed without restart.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-04-22 18:35:22
Subject: Re: trouble with to_char('L')
Previous:From: Greg Sabino MullaneDate: 2009-04-22 18:28:45
Subject: Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group