Re: Default shared memory SGML mention

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Default shared memory SGML mention
Date: 2001-05-08 20:37:48
Message-ID: 8134.989354268@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Yes, but shared memory limits are based on buffers, not connections,
> right? The per-connection overhead is pretty small, no?

I gave you my experimentally-derived formula already:

250Kb + 8350 * B + 14580 * N

I don't see how you can consider the N term negligible.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-08 20:54:23 Re: Default shared memory SGML mention
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-08 20:23:22 Re: Default shared memory SGML mention