Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> It seems I forgot about the serer side lo_import. Included are the
> patches to add new form of lo_import which accepts the large object id
> as the second argument.

> Comments, objection?

Breaking the type_sanity test is not acceptable.  Put in a second C
function.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: Proposal: new large object API at 2008-03-20 06:04:15 from Tatsuo Ishii

Responses

• Re: Proposal: new large object API at 2008-03-20 14:32:53 from Tatsuo Ishii

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tatsuo Ishii	Date: 2008-03-20 14:32:53
	Subject: Re: Proposal: new large object API
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2008-03-20 14:06:06
	Subject: Re: Problem identifying constraints which should not be inherited

pgsql-patches by date

Next:	From: Tatsuo Ishii	Date: 2008-03-20 14:32:53
	Subject: Re: Proposal: new large object API
Previous:	From: Simon Riggs	Date: 2008-03-20 14:07:43
	Subject: Re: Moving snapshot code around