Re: BUG #1517: SQL interval syntax is accepted by the parser,

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Roy Badami <roy(at)gnomon(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #1517: SQL interval syntax is accepted by the parser,
Date: 2005-03-20 17:44:46
Message-ID: 8052.1111340686@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I am wondering why we allow the 'interval' data type specification to be
> after the string.

Because that's what the standard demands. Please don't muddy the waters
by introducing yet more nonstandard syntax into the discussion.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-03-20 17:50:04 Re: BUG #1517: SQL interval syntax is accepted by the parser,
Previous Message Roy Badami 2005-03-20 15:46:50 Re: BUG #1517: SQL interval syntax is accepted by the parser,