| From: | Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Buglist |
| Date: | 2003-08-21 21:43:21 |
| Message-ID: | 7ueakvo283ou3jr31en9nja3cuis7k4qfb@4ax.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 21:10:34 +0530, "Shridhar Daithankar"
<shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> wrote:
>Point I am trying to make is to tune FSM and autovacuum frequency
>such that you catch all the dead tuples in RAM
You might be able to catch the pages with dead tuples in RAM, but
currently there's no way to keep VACUUM from reading in all the clean
pages, which can be far more ...
Servus
Manfred
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-08-21 21:56:02 | Re: Decent VACUUM (was: Buglist) |
| Previous Message | Ian Barwick | 2003-08-21 21:40:49 | Re: Need concrete "Why Postgres not MySQL" bullet list |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-08-21 21:46:03 | Re: [SQL] "SELECT IN" Still Broken in 7.4b |
| Previous Message | Ian Barwick | 2003-08-21 21:40:49 | Re: Need concrete "Why Postgres not MySQL" bullet list |