On Jan 3, 2008 8:54 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Do we really need "fhour_t" and "fminute_t" on top of "fsec_t"?
> > This seems like a bad factorization ...
> After some more thought: I think that what's bugging me is that "fsec_t"
> is intended to denote "fractional seconds". The other cases you have
> here seem not to be intended to be "fractional hours" or "fractional
> minutes". I'm not quite sure what the right abstraction is, but it
> doesn't seem to be that.
I thought it meant "field seconds". That's why I used fhour_t and
fminute_t. I'll think about a better name.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Gokulakannan Somasundaram||Date: 2008-01-04 07:36:19|
|Subject: Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-01-04 04:54:04|
|Subject: Re: timestamp typedefs |