On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:25:10 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 26, 2011 01:59:45 PM Radosław Smogura wrote:
>> I didn't followed this topic carefully, so sorry If I wrote
>> something
>> that was written, but I thought about following approach at least
>> for
>> message sending, etc.:
>>
>> 1. When initializing MemoryContext (pool) give one parameter that
>> will
>> be stack size. Stack is addition to normal operations.
> You can't allocate memory on the stack and return that.
>
> Andres
I didn't wrote allocate on stack. I thought about preallocate n bytes
chunk for stack-like memory but without popping.
Regards,
Radek