Re: measuring shared memory usage on Windows

From: "Harald Armin Massa" <haraldarminmassa(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: measuring shared memory usage on Windows
Date: 2006-10-16 11:18:40
Message-ID: 7be3f35d0610160418u51e4d256k15ee2a5e4ba9433@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Magnus,

> So: has anybody a hint how I can check how much shared_memory
> > is really used by PostgreSQL on Windows, to fine tune this parameter?
> >
> > I learned the hard way that just rising it can lead to a hard
> > performance loss :)
>
> Not really sure :) We're talking about anonymous mapped memory, and I
> don't think perfmon lets you look at that.

thanks for the clarification. However,

"anonymous mapped memory" site:microsoft.com

turns out 0 (zero) results. And even splitting it up there seems to be
nearly no information ... is the same thing by any chance also known by
different names?

> However, there is no limit to it as there often is on Unix - you can map
up to whatever the virtual RAM
> size is (2Gb/3Gb dependingo n what boot flag you use, IIRC). You can
> monitor it as a part of the total memory useage on the server, but
> there's no way to automatically show the difference between them.

So the "performance shock" with high shared memory gets obvious: memory
mapped files get swapped to disk. I assume that swapping is nearly
transparent for the application, leading to a nice trashing ...

I'll keep on searching...

Harald

--
GHUM Harald Massa
persuadere et programmare
Harald Armin Massa
Reinsburgstraße 202b
70197 Stuttgart
0173/9409607
-
Python: the only language with more web frameworks than keywords.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2006-10-16 12:05:05 Re: measuring shared memory usage on Windows
Previous Message mark 2006-10-16 11:00:23 Re: Hints proposal