Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Alexander Korotkov
> <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I think we definitely should apply this patch before 9.2 release, because it
>> is a bug fix. Otherwise people will continue produce incorrect GiST indexes
>> with in-core geometrical opclasses until 9.3. Patch is very simple and only
>> changes few lines of code.
>> Any thoughts?
> Do we need to apply this patch to 9.2?
It's been like that all along, no? I'm feeling hesitant to shove it
into 9.2 at this late date. But we should review it and get it into
9.3 early if possible.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2012-07-03 15:35:57|
|Subject: Re: [Review] Prevent the specification of conflicting
transaction read/write options|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2012-07-03 15:33:20|
|Subject: Re: [Review] Add SPI_gettypmod() to return a field's
typemod from a TupleDesc|