Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] src/test/regress/README duplicates SGML material

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-docs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] src/test/regress/README duplicates SGML material
Date: 2001-03-19 23:08:37
Message-ID: 7894.985043317@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> Is it really necessary to maintain identical text in the test README
>> file and in the SGML docs?  I'm sorely tempted to remove the README
>> rather than double-editing yet again.

> It's referenced from the INSTALL file, because people presumably won't be
> able to read the HTML during installation.  Actually, the README was once
> generated from the HTML version.  It can be done again, but the exact
> process it kind of hazy.

If you've got any hints, I could really use a clue right about now ...
otherwise I'll have to do these LOCALE edits twice ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2001-03-19 23:13:36
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] src/test/regress/README duplicates SGML material
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-03-19 22:37:33
Subject: src/test/regress/README duplicates SGML material

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2001-03-19 23:10:43
Subject: elog with automatic file, line, and function
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2001-03-19 22:56:32
Subject: More on elog and error codes

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group