Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: What's left?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>,Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>,"''Merlin Moncure' '" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>,"'pgsql-hackers-win32 '" <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: What's left?
Date: 2004-01-27 01:26:23
Message-ID: 7829.1075166783@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-hackers-win32pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> In this way, no one ever has the rename file open while we are holding
> the locks, and we can loop without holding an exclusive lock on
> pg_shadow, and file writes remain in order.

You're doing this where exactly, and are certain that you are holding no
locks why exactly?  And if you aren't holding a lock, what prevents
concurrency bugs?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-01-27 01:51:12
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] What's left?
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-01-27 01:23:08
Subject: Re: What's left?

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-01-27 01:51:12
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] What's left?
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-01-27 01:23:08
Subject: Re: What's left?

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-01-27 01:51:12
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] What's left?
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-01-27 01:23:08
Subject: Re: What's left?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group