Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] Re: Re: [HACKERS] ODBC Driver int8 Patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL odbc list <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Re: Re: [HACKERS] ODBC Driver int8 Patch
Date: 2001-01-23 21:46:12
Message-ID: 7826.980286372@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbcpgsql-patches
> didn't Tom have an objection to this, or, at least, a concern about
> forcing v2 specs?
>> 
>> Oh, I remember now.  Tom Lane was saying that we should vote if we want
>> v2 or v3 specs for ODBC.  He said moving to v3 in beta may be a problem,
>> and you said this can be easily backed out, so I applied it.  I think we
>> are stuck with v2 anyway.

I agree, we probably need to stick with the v2 spec for now.  I just
wanted to see if anyone thought that changing the reported version
number would be a better patch ;-)

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-odbc by date

Next:From: Cedar CoxDate: 2001-01-24 09:52:22
Subject: Re: Re: [INTERFACES] Re: more odbc patches
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2001-01-23 21:22:02
Subject: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] ODBC Driver int8 Patch

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-01-23 22:43:07
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] binary operators on integers
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2001-01-23 21:22:02
Subject: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] ODBC Driver int8 Patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group