Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #3881: lo_open leaks memory

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Akinde <michael(dot)akinde(at)met(dot)no>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #3881: lo_open leaks memory
Date: 2008-01-21 16:23:39
Message-ID: 7800.1200932619@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Michael Akinde <michael(dot)akinde(at)met(dot)no> writes:
> Some observations:
> - With small blobs, the memory usage doesn't blow up in this way. The 
> problem seems to require "big" blobs (although 140kb isn't really that 
> much).

Ah, that may be the root of the difference in our results --- I was
trying with small blobs.  Will retest.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-01-21 17:24:13
Subject: Re: BUG #3881: lo_open leaks memory
Previous:From: Michael AkindeDate: 2008-01-21 15:21:28
Subject: Re: BUG #3881: lo_open leaks memory

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group