Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: myProcLocks initialization

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: myProcLocks initialization
Date: 2011-10-31 20:03:47
Message-ID: 7776.1320091427@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Revised patch attached.  I think it would be useful to assert this
> both at process startup time and at process shutdown, since it would
> really be much nicer to have the process that didn't clean up fail the
> assertion, rather than the new one that innocently inherited its slot;
> so the attached patch takes that approach.

+1

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2011-10-31 20:15:54
Subject: Optimizing GetRunningTransactionLocks()
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2011-10-31 19:59:57
Subject: Re: LDAP server docs

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group