Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_restore new option -m

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr
Cc: pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_restore new option -m
Date: 2009-02-19 15:05:32
Message-ID: 7751.1235055932@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr writes:
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Tom Lane wrote:
>> You sure you don't get exactly the same without -m?
>> 
> yes!

We're going to need to see the test case then.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2009-02-19 15:07:03
Subject: Re: pg_restore new option -m
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-02-19 15:00:30
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Start background writer during archive recovery.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group