Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Current enums patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Dunstan <pgsql(at)tomd(dot)cc>
Subject: Re: Current enums patch
Date: 2007-03-31 19:17:47
Message-ID: 7736.1175368667@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> If you want to review or test the feature, the attached patch can be 
> used as a replacement for the portion that affects parse_coerce.c, and 
> with this it compiles and passes regression. I think it's correct but it 
> should still be OKed by at least one Tom. :-)

Since Neil seems to have dropped the ball on this, I'm going to pick it
up and review/apply it.  I need a break from thinking about HOT and
other bizarre schemes ;-)

Barring objection from Tom D, I'll start with this version.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-03-31 21:00:12
Subject: Re: Current enums patch
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2007-03-31 19:06:25
Subject: Re: Current enums patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group